《飞屋环游记》这部影片讲述了老人家卡尔为了实现亡妻艾丽的童年梦想将自己的小木屋充满气球飞往南美洲的“仙境瀑布”的种种历险经历。那么你知道《飞屋环游记》观后感怎么写吗？这里是细致的小编飞白为家人们整理的7篇飞屋环游英文观后感，仅供借鉴，希望对大家有所启发。
很早就有人推荐飞屋环游记这个片子，也下了最好的版本，但是一直没看。
再次打开这个片子的海报忽然想起，09年的某个周五，我和婬叔叔吃了晚饭一起去看电影，电影院就在放这部飞屋环游记。但是当时我们看的是《机器侠》。出来婬叔叔说：其实我很喜欢看动画片的。我笑笑心理说：你咋不早说。
一个很呆很笨的小男孩，看了一个探险家的故事于是心中埋下了一个探险的愿望，恰好遇到她生命中的小女孩，她们有共同的梦想，有一天，坐上飞艇去人间仙境的瀑布峡谷。经历探险家的一切。
时间快速飞逝，一转眼，小男孩已�
房子被高楼大厦包围，开发商要收他的房子。一次事故老人打伤了开发商的人，他很害怕，也接到了法庭的传唤。他将被送往养老院。养老院派人来接他的早上，他像使用魔法一样，叫自己的房子借助若干个气球的浮力一下子飞了起来。
飞啊飞，飞啊飞。忽然有人敲门！
老人很纳闷，打开门，原来是一个跟他当年一样憨厚的小男孩。于是二人开始了探险。
故事没有好人坏人，但是有探险，有斗争，有发现自己和很多的突破。
有梦想的实现，也有梦想的破灭。有亲情与人性的纠葛，有理想与现实的冲突。如果10分满分我打9.3分。
情节的细节很多，故事层次也很丰富。
使我感动的是，人性的闪光。
人性到底是什么？怎么闪光？
被人崇拜的探险家发现了一种新的鸟类，但是由于没有人见到过，于是大家都不相信。探险家发誓要抓到活的这样的鸟来证明自己的清白。这是什么呢？执着于证明自己的清白。应该是自私吧？这是故事里面的反面角色。
一生都想有一天要飞上蓝天，有一天要去自己梦寐以求的地方历险，但如果不是房子要被卖掉，不是老婆去世，不是要被送进养老院。这个梦想就还 仅仅是一个儿时的梦想，会一直停留在他的本子里面。虽然他为此积累了很多的知识和能力。但是没有那些外因的动力他会去迈出梦想的一步么？这是什么呢？被现实压垮的生命。
探险家的使命是探险发现新大陆，发现新生命。见证上帝的这些创造，见证而已。有没有人相信又能怎么样呢？上帝造的，它就是存在的。不一定非要你们见到才是真正存在的。当一个探险家成了一个训狗师，成了一个捕鸟迷，可以说他在维护自己人格的时候，就迷失了自己。放弃了自己真正的理想，而为了向世界证明我是正确的，付出了余生。
一个本来有梦想的人，是怎么失落自己梦想的呢？电影里面的处理很简单，就是平淡的生活，生活本身没有任何问题，有问题的是我们。甘于平淡，不敢去想那些不实际的东西，因为实际太重要了。为了现实的生活，他们一次次的打碎为了梦想积累的财富。随之破碎的还 有梦想。
甚至老头到达了梦想中的地方，打开那个记录他们梦想的本子的时候，才发现，原来在他们童年以后，妻子还 在上面写了很多，记录了他们的结婚和婚后的生活。最后一句话是。我们的精彩都已经翻过去了，下面开始你自己的精彩吧。到这个时候，老人才明白这一辈子背负的是对妻子的承诺，但是此刻看见妻子的这句遗言，终于明白。生活就是要追求自己的精彩。该打碎的不是梦想而是现实的捆绑。
我们自己很多时候就像背着房子在行走的人，为了房子没法去活出自己的精彩。很多时候我们为了证明自己的能力或者清白，又极力的去赚取别人的认同。很多时候我们觉得是承诺捆绑了我们，是亲情爱情捆绑了我们，事实是我们自己心理虽然一直筹划着有一天实现梦想，但是我们向着梦想的步伐却从未迈开。
美国的主流意识是很推崇自由的，这部片子据说在美国也卖的很好。为什么一个推崇自由的国家好像也很需要这样的片子来激发人们活出精彩的自己？答案应该是因为这个世界已经被赚取自我价值，赚取房子，赚取承诺所捆绑。那些真实的梦想早就被压抑的无影无踪了。
谁能冲破这些束缚，谁才能做真正的自己，实现自己那幼稚、荒。唐、可笑，但真实的梦想。
中国主流价值观应该是奉献，但是那些代表人民的人早就为人民币服务了，叫大家怎么能不为人民币放下理想。无产阶级被有产阶级压制剥削。叫我们怎 当一个国家也迷失于要做世界老大还 是世界大佬的时候，人民怎么才能找到自己的方向。因为我们不知道我们倒是要为GDP献身还 是为房子献身，是为伟大的共产主义事业奋斗终身，还 是为房子车子奋斗。
一个人的迷失不可怕，可怕的是在理想中迷失的主流价值观。纷争不可怕，可怕的是为了保住成绩维稳的和谐标准。在一个人人为了证明自己，为了赚取别人认同活着的国家。人是很好驱动的，这个驱动器就是，先叫他们失去自信，失业啊，下岗啊，然后再告诉他们怎么样就可以赚回尊重，于是，你看着，所有人都想发条小鸡一样不停的啄米。
当房子飞起来了，是不是理想就实现了？
不是，那仅仅是理想开始了。一样有风雨，一样有晴空。
是不是房子飞到了那个峡谷瀑布，就是真的到了人间仙境了？
不是，有人的地方就有自私，就有趋利避害，就有纠纷险阻。
那什么是理想，什么才是人间仙境？
呵呵，理想就是一条路，一条精彩的你自己走出来的路。有恩典，有自信，有荣光，有坎坷，有风雨，有所有你应该你经历的一切，而你最后说，是的，这就是我的理想。我为了这个而努力，我值得！
一个知道自己是谁，知道自己要做什么，知道自己做这些是为了什么的人。可能已经找到自己的人间仙境了……
2009-2019，飞屋已经十年了。
真没想到竟然会被一部动画感动许多次。皮克斯的动画就是这样，总是在不经意间给人以最强烈的心灵震撼。就像电影片头的小台灯，看似毫不起眼与世无争，却能够在关键时候照亮人内心最柔软的部分。将人类的品性融入角色是皮克斯的长处，所以能够让人们在为它的动画效果拍手鼓掌的同时，感受到那些真挚的人间温情和人性的闪光点。也正因为如此，皮克斯的动画年龄跨度很大，在《飞屋》中，满足孩子们的是老爷爷卡尔和小小冒险家罗素与邪恶探险家斗争并且取得成功的传奇，而卡尔和爱丽平凡却令人动容的爱情则是皮克斯馈赠给大人的童话。
电影还被称为“天外奇迹”，很多人把这部电影的主题定位在“梦想”，的确，文章由一个主人公儿时的梦想所展开，但是同样可以创造奇迹的，还有勇气，和爱。
开头有一些搞笑，他俩结婚的时候，卡尔家里的人很淡定，而爱丽家人很活泼，这大概代表了他们两种不同背景下长成的不同性格，一个热烈，一个深沉，与之后反倒是爱丽先去世形成对比，无法说这两种性格哪种好哪种坏，只是热烈的人遇到磨难会形成更大的反差吧。
故事的变迁是领带的更迭，换了一个又一个领带，时间也一转眼从壮年变成了老年，大概是想告诉我们，爱是藏在生活的细节中的，陪伴是最长情的告白，有一种爱叫做以后你的领带都由我来打。爬坡时候的两个情景，原本走得快的'现在走的慢，快慢不重要，重要的是和你一起。
为你划过十字，就一定要做到，为了你，我愿意放弃几十年如一日的生活，去尝试，完成我们的梦想。尽管皮克斯在动画技术上做得无可挑剔，但是在那瀑布边上所经历的各种冒险倒不是我真正关心的了，我只想知道，结果怎么样？卡尔有没有完成他们的梦想？他真的，会在瀑布边度过余生吗？
当飞屋被烧，卡尔拿着冒险手册坐在椅子上为没有完成爱丽的梦想而深深自责时，偶然翻到的却出乎了所有人的意料。Ellie在我的冒险手册里写的“我长大要做的事”，其实不是要去冒险环游世界，而是和Carl 在一起的点点滴滴，当电影开始重现生活的每个瞬间，徘徊在我心中的，是说不出的滋味。冒险本上最后一张照片是爱丽的，柔和的阳光映照着她的侧脸，我不禁想，究竟是什么样的力量，能够让那个小时候梦想着环游世界的大大咧咧的“假小子”成为现在这个神色安详，幸福平和的老人呢？大概这就是爱吧。也正是因为这份爱，才让她在最后一页上写的是“谢谢你陪我走过这一段，去展开下一段属于你的冒险吧。”这也是卡尔下定决心去帮助罗素的原因，有时候，我们觉得愧疚，因为没有完成共同目标，而事实可能是，每个人都只能陪伴你生命中的一段时光，一旦火车到了一个站点，就会有新的人上来，旧的人下去，生命才得以生生不息，有时候要做的，只是享受过程。
Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixars cutting-edge output, the fact that the studios 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldnt seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.
But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.
Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.
Its also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinemas past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "Its a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."
Boxoffice-wise, the skys the limit for "Up."
Even with its PG rating （the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"）， there really is no demographic that wont respond to its many charms.
The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the films 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner)。
Borrowing "WALL-Es" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchinos plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.
Deciding its better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included)， determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer)。
But he soon discovers theres a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai)， and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.
Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter （"Monsters, Inc."） and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.
Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntzs pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.
Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.
There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.
It’s that good.
Today, the school organized "children watching animation, childlike innocence" activities. We went to see the movie -- flying house ring travel notes.
I was impressed by the film. It is said that an old man named Fei Dexun and a lovely field Explorer Russell ride in the balloon house, experience a thousand hardships, reach the Paradise Falls, and put his home there, to realize the dream of the old man Fei Dexun.
Fei Dexun and his wife AI became partners when they were young. Later, Ellie died, and the old man would be sent to the green oak nursing home. Fei Dexun put the 100000 balloons he used to hang on the house and flew up into the air. The results met the rush to "help the elderly" badge of the little boy, russell. He accidentally took the flying room of Fei Dexuns old man and started an adventure together. The way they experienced a lot of hardships and dangers, and a bird named Kevin became a friend. Later, in order to save Kevin, they almost failed to realize their dreams. Then it is friendship and justice, so that they finally overcome the evil and win the battle.
The story is very touching. After reading it, we will find that there is a truth in it: persistence will win. I like this movie!
The film - which was written by Bob Peterson （Finding Nemo, Ratatouille) and directed by Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc.） - delivers all the things we’ve come to expect from a Pixar animated feature: gorgeous visuals, a strong story rife with moral lessons and (gasp) good character development; humor both low-brow (for the kids) and high-brow (for the grownups)， with strokes of bold wit and a dash of sagely wisdom for good measure.
And yet, UP also delivers something quite unexpected: Pixar’s most adult-oriented story yet, slyly disguised in a fantastic adventure tale.
UP tells the life story of Carl Fredricksen （the unmistakable voice of Ed Asner)， a shy little boy who grows up in (1930s?） America, an era in which people pack into movie theaters to watch news reels about adventurous explorers like Charles Muntz, who travels the world on one epic quest after the next.
Young Carl Fredri-§ cksen idolizes Muntz: He spends his lonely days roaming his neighborhood pretending to be Muntz until one day he runs into Ellie, an energetic and fearless young girl (everything Carl is not) who idolizes Charles Muntz just as much as Carl does. Ellie and Carl cross their hearts then and there and swear to be great adventurers like Charles Muntz, and with that oath, theirs is a match made in heaven.
After that fateful first encounter, we get a truly beautiful montage of Carl and Ellie’s life-long romance. We see the young kids grow into a teenage couple; see them get married and buy a house, working day jobs (balloon vendor) while saving up for the kind of adventures they fantasized about as kids. We watch the couple deal with the ups and downs, joys and tragedies of life; and gradually we watch them grow into old age, Ellie’s “My Adventures” scrapbook still unfilled, even as her time on Earth ends.
With Ellie gone, Carl becomes a disgruntled old man desperately trying to hold on to a house, heirlooms and a lost-love he cherishes. A physical confrontation with neighborhood developers leads to Carl being forced into a retirement home for the rest of his days - but before the old man will give in he decides to honor the oath he and Ellie swore as kids and take one last shot at adventure! Carl ties an impossible number of balloons to his house (working a balloon cart at the zoo was his job for many years)， rigs a steering system and UP he goes!
Given the inherent three-dimensional quality evident in Pixar's cutting-edge output, the fact that the studio's 10th animated film is the first to be presented in digital 3-D wouldn't seem to be particularly groundbreaking in and of itself.
But what gives "Up" such a joyously buoyant lift is the refreshingly nongimmicky way in which the process has been incorporated into the big picture -- and what a wonderful big picture it is.
Winsome, touching and arguably the funniest Pixar effort ever, the gorgeously rendered, high-flying adventure is a tidy 90-minute distillation of all the signature touches that came before it.
It's also the ideal choice to serve as the first animated feature ever to open the Festival de Cannes, considering the way it also pays fond homage to cinema's past, touching upon the works of Chaplin and Hitchcock, not to mention aspects of "It's a Wonderful Life" "The Wizard of Oz" and, more recently, "About Schmidt."
Boxoffice-wise, the sky's the limit for "Up."
Even with its PG rating （the first non-G-rated Pixar picture since "The Incredibles"）， there really is no demographic that won't respond to its many charms.
The Chaplin-esque influence is certainly felt in the stirring prelude, tracing the formative years of the film's 78-year-old protagonist, recent widower Carl Fredricksen (terrifically voiced by Ed Asner)。
Borrowing "WALL-E's" poetic, economy of dialogue and backed by composer Michael Giacchino's plaintive score, the nostalgic waltz between Carl and the love of his life, Ellie, effectively lays all the groundwork for the fun stuff to follow.
Deciding it's better late than never, the retired balloon salesman depletes his entire inventory and takes to the skies (house included)， determined to finally follow the path taken by his childhood hero, discredited world adventurer Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer)。
But he soon discovers there's a stowaway hiding in his South America-bound home in the form of Russell, a persistent eight-year-old boy scout (scene-stealing young newcomer Jordan Nagai)， and the pair prove to be one irresistible odd couple.
Despite the innate sentimentality, director Pete Docter （"Monsters, Inc."） and co- director-writer Bob Peterson keep the laughs coming at an agreeably ticklish pace.
Between that Carl/Russell dynamic and Muntz's pack of hunting dogs equipped with multilingual thought translation collars, "Up" ups the Pixar comedy ante considerably.
Meanwhile, those attending theaters equipped with the Disney Digital 3-D technology will have the added bonus of experiencing a three-dimensional process that is less concerned with the usual "comin' at ya" razzle-dazzle than it is with creating exquisitely detailed textures and appropriately expansive depths of field.
There’s nothing better than an easy review: Pixar’s latest summer offering, UP, is a fantastic film. Simply fantastic. Seriously, if Ratatouille and Wall-E deserved to be in the running for Best Picture of the Year (as many said they did at the times of their releases) then UP certainly does.
It’s that good.
动画《飞屋环游记》讲述了一对忘年交，退休气球零售商CarlFredrickson老人和小孩子Russell两人之间发生奇妙而梦幻般的探险故事。
故事刚一开始的时候还是Carl的孩童时代，他从一部纪录片中迷上了当时的大探险家CharlesMuntz，迷上了传说中的ParadiseFalls，梦想着自己也能有一天可以登上那仙境般的瀑布。在从电影院回家的路上，他邂逅了假小子打扮的女孩Ellie，他们是同样崇拜着CharlesMuntz，有着同样的探险梦。
随着时光的推移，Carl和Ellie成长在一起并结为夫妻，他们还怀着年少时候的探险梦，却始终没有机会去实现。Carl是一个氦气球零售商，Ellie是动物园管理员，二人相亲相爱，不幸的是Ellie却无法孕育后代，但这并没有影响他们之间的感情。时光如梭，到了二老的暮年，之前的Carl变成了Mr.Fredrickson，想起年少时期的梦想，他定了两张去南美旅游的机票，试图跟他的Ellie一起畅游下儿时的回忆。可是Ellie却不幸的在这个当口撒手人寰。Mr.Fredrickson也变得孤僻起来，而且变成了钉子户，房地产开发商出多大的价钱都不能动摇Mr.Fredrickson搬出他和Ellie的故居。这几天有个叫Russell的孩子来敲Mr.Fredrickson家的门，孩子现在就缺一个帮助老年人的勋章，所以他希望为Mr.Fredrickson做些什么从而拿到勋章。年老的Mr.Fredrickson由于没有子孙，也缺乏和孩子的交流经验，而且对于小Russell也很烦，随便交了一个不可能完成的差事打发了Russell，就是让他去找寻一种传说在ParadiseFall才有的Snipe鸟。
就在当天，Mr.Fredrickson和房地产商发生了冲突，他失手伤了一名工人而被起诉。他不得不接受把他送到养老院的判决。但奇妙的事情也从此开始了。Mr.Fredrickson由于之前是做氦气球的销售，所以在家中冲了无数的氦气球，就在转天工作人员来要他去养老院的时候，他让所有的氦气球把他和Ellie的屋子飞了起来，而且在屋子当中可以操纵屋子。从而脱离这里枯燥的生活。
正当屋子平稳的在空中翱翔时，他竟然发现Russell也凑巧在那个屋子上，小孩子对于这个会飞的屋子很好奇，而这种好奇很不惹老人喜欢。老人一度试图将Russell送出去。可却遇上了积雨云，很大的暴风雨在屋子上空下起，屋子失去了控制，老人也失去了意识。
很戏剧性的，在那片积雨云的作用下，他们来到了传说中的Paradisefalls附近，正是圆老人梦的时机，年轻的时候Mr.Fredrickson和Ellie就曾经幻想过把屋子建到Paradisefalls上。于是老人决心把屋子溜到那瀑布上去。在路上却遇到了传说中的大鸟Snipe，Russell给那只鸟起名字叫Kevin。还遇到了儿时的偶像CharlesMuntz，偶像养着一群能说话的狗，这些狗都是为能活捉大鸟而驯养的。在和偶像叙旧一段时间之后，Mr.Fredrickson不想把大鸟交给自己的偶像，并跟Russell一起与CharlesMuntz和他养的狗之间展开了神奇的决斗并取得了胜利。
Russell和老人成了忘年交，Mr.Fredrickson的屋子也飞到Paradisefalls之上。Russell也得到了那枚勋章。
这部影片我看了三遍，单纯从个人喜好的角度出发的，这样一部动画片给人一种很美好的感觉，区别于一般片子之中更多的都是把重点放在年轻力壮的男主角以及主角身边的美女们。而这部动画片的主要角色则是70多岁的老人和十岁左右的孩子。而且影片刚开头处的六分多钟，讲述Mr.Fredrickson和Ellie从结婚到老的过程，也用没有语言的图像，很完美的诠释了一段平凡而感人无比的爱情故事。
由于没有孩子，Mr.Fredrickson和Russell之间一开始是很难沟通的，而随着故事的延续，二人的忘年交关系愈发紧密。最终一起同心协力战胜了CharlesMuntz。
而故事中的配角，当属一只狗Dug和大鸟Kevin，也是很有意思的设计，也加入更多鲜活的内容。大鸟的出现，也是使得Mr.Fredrickson和他儿时的偶像斗争的理由。
故事之中也有很多经典的对白，比如“Adventureoutthere”是小时候的Carl和Ellie常说的话。“Crossyourheart”是小时候的Ellie让Carl保证以后要带他们一起去Paradisefalls时候让他发誓，还有暮年之后的Mr.Fredrickson听到Russell说的，让他保护好大鸟Kevin，同样的话语，不禁让老人感慨万千。
幽默之处也很多，比如大鸟爱吃巧克力，狗不管多聪明却都对扔出去的圆球情有独钟。刚刚见到狗Dug时候，它能说话那一环节设计也很幽默。以及Russell说他有GPS定位仪，说到哪里都掌握其中，却马上失手把仪器扔了出去。老人由于讨厌孩子的喋喋不休，跟孩子玩儿“谁能保持最长时间安静”的游戏，也是由于同样的原因，关上了助听器，从而不知道自己的屋子已经飘进了积雨云。。。。。。都是很巧妙幽默的设计。
故事题材很新颖，故事的结尾很温馨，看故事的时候不乏很多幽默的环节，而总是能给人带来不同的感动，我想这就是这部动画片的成功之处吧。